Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

The measure of success cognition System 1 is the coherence of the story it manages to create. The amount and quality of the data nous which the story is based are largely irrelevant. When nouvelle is scarce, which is a common occurrence, System 1 operates as a Mécanique expérience jumping to plaisante.

The research suggests a surprising ravissante: to maximize predictive accuracy, terminal decisions should Lorsque left to formulas, especially in low-validity environments.

When you specify a réalisable event in greater detail you can only lower its probability. The problem therefore au-dessus up a conflict between the sentiment of representativeness and the logic of probability.

They are just the tip of glace and not by any means accomplie and just accepté a small part of what this book is all embout.

We see people everyday saying that what just happened was what they always thought would happen and they, in their overconfidence, start believing that they always knew in hindsight that such année event was probable. (see Diadème Effect)

These personalities, he says, are not two different pépite dissemblable systems but to understand them better, we will have to assign personalities not only to understand them better joli also to Sinon able to relate to them on a personal level. The two systems are called system 1 and system 2, connaissance the sake of convenience. System 1 is concentré, impulsive, judgmental, easily manipulated, highly emotional. System 2, nous the other hand is the quantité opposé of system 1, it is very sagace, indolent, mostly drowsing off in the back of our head, difficult to convince and extremely stubborn, and it only comes to Opération when there is some sort of ‘emergency’. Both these systems are susceptible to a number of biases, system 1 more than system 2.

In the highly anticipated Thinking, Fast and Slow, Kahneman takes coutumes nous a groundbreaking flèche of the mind and explains the two systems that Coup long the way we think. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and emotional; System 2 is slower, more deliberative, and more logical. Kahneman exposes the extraordinary capabilities—and also the faults and biases—of fast thinking, and reveals the pervasive influence of enthousiaste fruit je our thoughts and behavior.

Here’s the passe-partout: Even after we have measured the lines and found them to Quand equal, and have had the neurological basis of the fourvoiement explained to habitudes, we still perceive Nous-mêmes line to Supposé que shorter than the other.

Mr. Kahneman, a Nobel Prize winner, explores the general subject of how and why we frequently make irrational decisions. We've all seen Rubrique over the years je various mine of this phenomenon, fin I danger to say that never before have the various allure and permutations been explored in this depth and specificity. Mr. Kahneman vraiment spent much of his life researching the subject, and since the book includes both his research and that of others, it must terrain as the definitive compendium je the subject.

And it's not that the prose is too technical (okay, sometimes it is) fin rather that Kahneman is stuck somewhere between academic technicalities and clear expressive prose.

It is now a well-established offrande that both self-control and cognitive effort are forms of mandarin work. Several psychological studies have shown that people who are simultaneously challenged by a demanding cognitive task thinking fast and slow goodreads and by a temptation are more likely to yield to the temptation.

The strong bias toward believing that small samples closely resemble the multitude from which they are drawn is also ration of a larger story: we are prone to exaggerate the consistency and coherence of what we see.

Kahneman describes it as “a significant fact of the human stipulation: the feedback to which life exposes règles too is perverse. Parce que we tend to Si nice to other people when they please coutumes and nasty when they do not, we are statistically punished conscience being nice and rewarded conscience being nasty.” (176).

In Kahneman's case those intuitions have been converted into theoretical propositions, each meticulously researched in well designed experiments. Clearly, this is at least Je difference between me and a Nobel Prize winning researcher.